<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New Media Mania&#187; tagging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newmediamania.com/tag/tagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newmediamania.com</link>
	<description>One bloke&#039;s sporadic attempts to understand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 02:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How Can Your Audience Benefit from Tagging?</title>
		<link>http://newmediamania.com/2008/11/how-can-your-audience-benefit-from-tagging/</link>
		<comments>http://newmediamania.com/2008/11/how-can-your-audience-benefit-from-tagging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Gillbanks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folksonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmediamania.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Knowledge managers who would jump on the tagging bandwagon need to understand that there must be something in it for the user. People won’t tag something for the sake of it, or as a favour to the publisher. In the case of Del.icio.us, people value the go-anywhere bookmarking functionality first and foremost. And being able [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmediamania.com/2008/11/how-can-your-audience-benefit-from-tagging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Vs Traditional Classification: It Can Be Both</title>
		<link>http://newmediamania.com/2008/11/social-vs-traditional-classification/</link>
		<comments>http://newmediamania.com/2008/11/social-vs-traditional-classification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 06:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Gillbanks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[folksonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social classification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newmediamania.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To suggest that social classification systems will replace formal traditional classification on the web is to imply that there is no place on the web for bodies of professional, scientific, or other specialised knowledge that possess standardised nomenclature critical for mutual understanding. Conversely, those who would argue that social tagging has no place in highly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://newmediamania.com/2008/11/social-vs-traditional-classification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

